- Activity Graph
It seems that the shape concerns are resolved and also the implementation was under remark. If the RFC end up being arranged to have talk within TechCom?
Apparently the proper execution issues try resolved and also the execution is below feedback. Should the RFC getting booked to possess discussion from the TechCom?
- The fresh new proposal in the activity dysfunction is quite unlike just what might have been implemented. For it to advance just like the an RFC, the job malfunction should be up-to-date so you can echo that which we are generally considering.
- Do not know if this really is suggested purely once the a third party ability, or even for deployment toward WMF possibilities. In case it is for third people, may possibly not actually you want a keen RFC, that can possibly be done just like the an expansion as well. If it is to have WMF design, we will have to seem carefully towards the ramifications having caching and you will abilities.
Seemingly the design inquiries was resolved and execution was below opinion. If the RFC become arranged having dialogue at TechCom?
- Brand new offer about activity malfunction is quite not the same as what could have been observed. For it to progress because the an enthusiastic RFC, the task description should be up-to-date to help you echo what we happen to be looking at.
- We don’t determine if this might be suggested strictly while the a 3rd party feature, or deployment to the WMF possibilities. In case it is just for 3rd events, may possibly not actually you prefer an RFC, and could possibly performed just like the an extension as well. In case it is to possess WMF design, we will see to look carefully to your effects to possess caching and you will results.
W.r.t. #step 1 – The proper execution provides in reality progressed as we performs having for the section anchor significantly more practical and you may user-friendly. We could enhance the brand new breakdown associated with the RFC. #dos – Does “implementation to the WMF assistance” suggest while making it part of MediaWiki key software? I think it has for ages been the latest assumption, that is the reason it offers been through of a lot iterations from construction, i18n and perf update 🙂 You may WMF relatives chime in to confirm that is nonetheless the newest instance?
#dos – Does “deployment toward WMF assistance” mean and make so it element of MediaWiki core application? I think it’s got always been the assumption, for this reason , it’s gone through of many iterations of framework, i18n and you can perf update 🙂 You are going to WMF nearest and dearest chime directly into establish this is nonetheless the brand new situation?
It indicates providing they toward no less than a number of the WMF websites. Be it element of core or an expansion actually very associated. The original RFC might have been recorded to the notion of which have that it enabled on Wikipedia and you can members of the family, however, Let me have specific phrase thereon on the relevant WMF men and women.
- Do not know if this is proposed strictly as the a 3rd people function, or deployment towards the WMF expertise. If it’s for third parties, it might not actually you would like an enthusiastic RFC, and may even perhaps be performed since the an extension too. If it is getting WMF development, we will see to appear very closely to your ramifications getting caching and you may performance.